“This comprehensive study of Koine Greek phonology sets a new standard for understanding how New Testament Greek was actually pronounced.”
—Journal of Language, Culture, & Religion
“Kantor has produced a valuable monograph that addresses the pronunciation of Greek in Palestine during the Hellenistic, Roman, and Byzantine periods. He has collected a vast amount of data from epigraphic and documentary sources, and he has convincingly assessed it with a valid methodology. This study would also be useful in textual criticism for recognizing potential variants that sound alike and in recognizing itacisms and other spelling interchanges found in inscriptions and manuscripts, especially if one is only accustomed to read using an Erasmian pronunciation.”
—Review of Biblical Literature
“Careful readers will find here a trove of information and persuasive judgments in a book that sets a new and high standard for studies of ‘New Testament’ Greek phonology. Highly recommended.”
—Religious Studies Review
“This is a major work of research, first-rate quality, and will immediately become indispensable to all working in Greek epigraphy of the region, as well as literary texts and papyri written in Koine. I am deeply impressed. It will become the reference work on the subject.”
—Jonathan J. Price
Tel Aviv University
“This book displays exceptional learning spread across many centuries and various languages to get at a topic that always intrigues Classicists and New Testament scholars. Kantor shows just how much evidence, spanning a vast range of material from classical and Rabbinic literature as well as from inscriptions and documentary papyri, is relevant to this task. It is a monumental achievement to assemble a book of such massive scope as well as linguistic sophistication. A triumph!”
—Simon Gathercole
University of Cambridge
“This book succeeds in establishing a precise chronology for the phonological development of Koine Greek in Judea-Palestine from Alexander to Mohammed—in an exhaustive yet accessible manner. The challenge is to apply its approach to the more numerous papyri and inscriptions from Egypt.”
—Peter van Minnen
University of Cincinnati
