Add To Cart
- Media Type▼▲
- Author / Artist▼▲
- Top Rated▼▲
For Love of Animals taps into the Franciscan tradition of care for creation by offering a Catholic view of the ethical treatment of animals, supported by Scripture, tradition, and Church teaching. You'll be challenged with discussion questions to evaluate your own behavior in light of your Christian faith.
Number of Pages: 144
Vendor: Franciscan Media
Publication Date: 2013
|Dimensions: 8.50 X 5.50 (inches)|
Care for Creation: A Franciscan Spirituality of the EarthIlia Delio, O.S.F., Keith Douglass Warner, O.F.M. & Pamela WoodSt. Anthony Messenger Press / 2008 / Trade Paperback$17.09 Retail:
$18.99Save 10% ($1.90)
Ecological Footprints : An Essential Franciscan Guide for Faith and Sustainable LivingDawn M. Nothwehr, OSFLiturgical Press / Trade Paperback$21.99 Retail:
$39.95Save 45% ($17.96)
This book explains how traditional Christian ideas and principleslike nonviolence, concern for the vulnerable, respect for life, stewardship of God's creation, and rejection of consumerismrequire us to treat animals morally. Though this point of view is often thought of as liberal, the book cites several conservatives who are also concerned about animals. Camosy's Christian argument transcends secular politics.
The book's starting point for a Christian position on animalsfrom the creation story in Genesis to Jesus' eating habits in the Gospelsrests in Scripture. It then moves to explore the views of the Church Fathers, the teachings of the Catholic Church, and current discussions in both Catholic and Protestant theology. Ultimately, however, the book is concerned not with abstract ideas, but with how we should live our everyday lives. Should Christians eat meat? Is cooperation with factory farming evil? What sort of medical research on animals is justified? Camosy also asks difficult questions about hunting and pet ownership.
This is an ideal resource for those who are interested in thinking about animals from the perspective of Christian ethics and the consistent ethic of life. Discussion questions at the end of each chapter and suggestions for further reading round out the usefulness of this important work.
....[T]his book achieves something important: it offers Catholics a chance to reflect on what we eat, how we relate to God’s creation and ultimately who we are. Scott Kline, The Christian Herald, Toronto
And for good reason: its subjectthe rights and wrongs of our modern treatment of animals, especially (though not only) mammals, and especially (though not only) the creatures of factory farmsis simultaneously morally urgent and widely ignored by many people, including and inexplicably by many well-meaning but hitherto under-informed Christians.
Dr. Camosy has now remedied that defect with this lively, thoughtful, and original book. It ranges widely but with a teacherly touch over subjects as diverse as the history of Christian vegetarianism; papal and other pronouncements about creation; the development of Christian theology concerning nonhuman persons, such as angels; the morality of dogfighting; the relevance of laws against child labor; the question of pets; the truth about factory farming; and much more. Throughout, the author convinces the reader both that our culture’s treatment of defenseless creatures is morally indefensible much of the time; and also that “those of us who follow Jesus Christ,” in particular, “should give animals special moral consideration and attention.”
It is rampant and unexamined Western consumerism, more than anything else, that “disconnects[s] us from the process by which pig meat gets on our plate.” I would add to that analysis the friendly amendment that this same consumerism encourages the formation of a habit that is suspect wherever and whenever it appears, but that chronically gets a pass where animals are involved: that is, a practiced desire to remain ignorant of those things about which we wish not to know.It would be gratifying if the book were also to start a serious discussion in Christian religious quarters. One wonders, for example, whether vegetarianism for some believers might be a unique “sign of contradiction” in its own right—particularly in a time of relative plenty marked by rampant consumerism, and particularly given what Pope John Paul II decried as an accompanying “culture of death.” Wanton cruelty to animals, of the sort that is now pitiably routine, is arguably part and parcel of that same culture, and it further deadens the general moral sense at a time when it’s arguably needed most. As a vegetarian named Leo Tolstoy once put it, in a powerful 1909 essay that he wrote about a slaughterhouse: “[W]e cannot pretend that we do not know this. We are not ostriches, and cannot believe that if we refuse to look at what we do not wish to see, it will not exist.”
The community of people now struggling to understand as much, and to do right by creatures both great and small, is in the process of constructing a wholly new big tent. Thanks to Camosy’s welcome contribution, it just got noticeably bigger. from the Foreword, Mary Eberstadt, Senior fellow with the Ethics and Public Policy Center, Washington, DC, August 2013