- All Products
- Accompaniment Tracks
- Bible Accessories
- Bible Covers
- Bible Studies & Curriculum
- Buy in Bulk
- Christian Living
- Church & Pastoral
- Church Supplies
- Clothing & Accessories
- Crafts & Recreation
- eBooks On Sale
- Gift & Home
- Last Chance Bargains
- New Release
- Slightly Imperfect
- Streaming Video
- Student & Teens
- Sunday School
Have questions about eBooks? Check out our eBook FAQs.
|Format: DRM Protected ePub|
Publication Date: 2012
Series: Counterpoints: Bible and Theology
The apostle Paul was a vital force in the development of Christianity. Pauls historical and religious context affects the theological interpretation of Pauls writings, no small issue in the whole of Christian theology.
Recent years have seen much controversy about the apostle Paul, his religious and social context, and its effects on his theology. In the helpful Counterpoints format, four leading scholars present their views on the best framework for describing Pauls theological perspective, including his view of salvation, the significance of Christ, and his vision for the churches.
Contributors and views include:
- Reformed View: Thomas R. Schreiner
- Catholic View: Luke Timothy Johnson
- Post-New Perspective View: Douglas Campbell
- Jewish View: Mark D. Nanos
Like other titles in the Counterpoints: Bible and Theology collection, Four Views on the Apostle Paul gives theology students the tools they need to draw informed conclusions on debated issues.
General editor and New Testament scholar Michael F. Bird covers foundational issues and provides helpful summaries in his introduction and conclusion. New Testament scholars, pastors, and students of Christian history and theology will find Four Views on the Apostle Paul an indispensable introduction to ongoing debates on the apostle Pauls life and teaching.
Michael F. Bird (PhD, University of Queensland) is lecturer in theology at Ridley Melbourne College of Mission and Ministry in Melbourne, Australia. He is the author of Jesus and the Origins of the Gentile Mission, The Saving Righteousness of God: Studies on Paul, Justification, and the New Perspective, Evangelical Theology, Bourgeois Babes, Bossy Wives, and Bobby Haircuts: A moderate Case for Gender Equality in Ministry and editor of The Apostle Paul: Four Views. He is also a co-blogger of the New Testament blog "Euangelion."
Stanley N. Gundry is executive vice president and editor-in-chief for the Zondervan Corporation. He has been an influential figure in the Evangelical Theological Society, serving as president of ETS and on its executive committee, and is adjunct professor of Historical Theology at Grand Rapids Theological Seminary. He is the author of seven books and has written many articles appearing in popular and academic periodicals.
Douglas Campbell is a New Testament professor at Duke Divinity School. His main research interests comprise the life and thought (i.e. theology and its development) of Paul with particular reference to soteriological models rooted in apocalyptic as against justification or salvation-history. However, he is interested in contributions to Pauline analysis from modern literary theory, from modern theology, from epistolary theory, ancient rhetoric, ancient comparative religion, modern linguistics and semantic theory, and from sociology. His recent publications include The Rhetoric of Righteousness in Romans 3:21-26, and he edited The Call to Serve: Biblical and Theological Perspectives on Ministry in Honour of Bishop Penny Jamieson. Dr. Campbell has also written The Quest for Paul's Gospel: A Suggested Strategy (2005), and The Deliverance of God: An Apocalyptic Rereading of Justification in Paul (2009).
Mark D. Nanos is Soebbing Distinguished Scholar-in-Residence, Rockhurst University. Visit Mark's website at www.marknanos.com.
Luke Timothy Johnson (Ph.D., Yale) is the R.W. Woodruff Professor of New Testament and Christian Origins at Candler School of Theology at Emory University. His research concerns the literary, moral, and religious dimensions of the New Testament, including the Jewish and Greco-Roman contexts of early Christianity (particularly moral discourse), Luke-Acts, the Pastoral Letters, and the Letter of James. A prolific author, Dr. Johnson has penned numerous scholarly articles and more than 25 books. His 1986 book The Writings of the New Testament: An Interpretation, now in its second edition, is widely used in seminaries and departments of religion throughout the world.
A former Benedictine monk, Dr. Johnson is a highly sought-after lecturer, a member of several editorial and advisory boards, and a senior fellow at Emory University's Center for the Study of Law and Religion. He received the prestigious 2011 Louisville Grawemeyer Award in Religion for his most recent book, Among the Gentiles: Greco-Roman Religion and Christianity (2009, Yale University Press), which explores the relationship between early Christianity and Greco-Roman paganism.
Thomas R. Schreiner (PhD, Fuller Theological Seminary) is James Buchanan Harrison Professor of New Testament and associate dean of Scripture and interpretation at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky. The author of numerous books, he is the preaching pastor of Clifton Baptist Church in Louisville, Kentucky.
Grace for SinnersSimpsonville, SCAge: 25-34Gender: male5 Stars Out Of 5Loved This Four ViewsJuly 30, 2012Grace for SinnersSimpsonville, SCAge: 25-34Gender: maleQuality: 5Value: 5Meets Expectations: 5I really enjoyed this four views. It's the first of the series I've read but it won't be the last. I wasn't sure at first glance if it was a book on the historical Paul or his theology. It ended up about the later which was a perfect fit because I had already been reading in that area of theology.
The four contributors were Thomas R. Schreiner, Luke Timothy Johnson, Douglas A. Campbell, & Mark D. Nanos. Each was commissioned to answer four main questions:
What did Paul think about salvation?
What was Paul's view of the significance of Christ?
What is the best framework for describing Paul's theological perspective?
What was Paul's vision for the churches?
Schreiner approached these questions from a reformed Baptist perspective, Luke Timothy Johnson from a Roman Catholic perspective, Douglas A. Campbell from a post new perspective, & Nanos from a Jewish perspective (a simplification of positions but it gives you an idea).
I sympathized most with Schreiner's position but also found much to be commended in Nanos's chapter as well. We have lost some of the Jewishness of Paul. Ironically, Nanos rejects the NPP. It seems the NPP supporters have stepped out the hot pile with one foot and into the steaming leftovers with the other (moving the historical focus from legalism to a tacit racism). Nanos also strongly rejects Schreiner's position because of some of the historical anti-seminism found in its proponents. While sympathetic to that point, I would have liked a softer blow. If Paul had actually been against Judaism, it doesn't follow that against necessarily implies racist or hate. For instance, I am against Mormonism, Jehovah's Witness, Roman Catholics, and Liberal "Protestants" but I do not wish them harm and would die for their free practice of religion. I would love to have Schreiner and Nanos sit down and have a serious back forth in regards to their positions. Nanos's counter-point to Schreiner seemed distracted by previous interactions.
We need more research and study in the field of Paul's distinctive Jewishness. Dr. Tom Holland has already rung this bell loudly in his Contours of Pauline Theology (read my review). I would argue that Paul was not anti-Judaism but he may have been combative against a deformity in it. For instance, I am a Christian and am decidedly for the spread of Christianity but also frequently speak out against those who claim the name but who are false teachers. We must place Christianity in that context. It's in the same family tree of Judaism and therefore we must be decidedly for Judaism during Jesus's time. Jesus was a good Jew who fulfilled the perfect law of God. Nanos makes some helpful points like reminding us that when we talk about law we should talk about the teaching about loving God and neighbor. His arguments, however, falls short when trying to prove that the law was in full effect for Paul and his fellow Jews. Schreiner's commentary was quite constructive in this regard.
On the other hand, I found it surprising that I agreed with a good bit of what Johnson said; more so than with Campbell. It's ironic that on many principles Catholics are closer to conservative Protestantism than the liberals are. I found Campbell's sections the least compelling. He seemed content to ride the hobby horse all the way into the barn. He vehemently rejects the "Lutheran" understand of salvation but doesn't do the perspective justice in my opinion. He also rejects the conclusion of the NPP (hurray) but accepts the foundations of those conclusion (boo). Johnson rightly suggests in his counter point that in that case one should also question the foundation. His chapter was based solely on Romans 5-8 (beloved chapters) but hard to develop a theology on three chapters of what Paul said. He also rejects a large amount of Paul's writing. And in response to Paul's teaching in Timothy about women (brought up by Johnson in discussion of the household codes) Campbell simply dismisses the letters as not from Paul. He does this while also making unsupported claims like "Junia is an apostle" (no mention of the large amount of linguistic research that says otherwise) and "Phoebe is a patroness" (which I'm not sure what being a patron has to do with the topic at all). As an example, he says,
At this point it seems that we simply have to admit that Paul's admonition to slaves and women in terms of hierarchical Greco-Roman categories are inconsistent with central Christian truths that he spends much of his time advocating elsewhere. Consequently these texts should be reinterpretted and redeployed (p. 104).
Statements like these give me pause. It would be hard to arrive at a holistic theology of Paul when you miss the baby in the bathwater in these texts.
I loved this book. I love the study of Pauline theology. This book had the perfect mixture of perspectives which were compelling and instructive in the current dialogue. If you're interested in Pauline theology but don't have the nerve to start the real heavy lifting, Four Views will give you just enough to get into the conversation without delving too much into the technical side.
Find Related Products▼▲
- Download >> eBooks >> Biblical Studies >> Biblical Theology
- Download >> eBooks >> Biblical Studies >> New Testament Studies
- Download >> eBooks >> Biblical Studies >> Pauline Studies
- Download >> eBooks >> Theology >> Biblical Theology
- Download >> eBooks >> Theology >> Topics of Debate
- eBooks >> Biblical Studies >> Biblical Theology
- eBooks >> Biblical Studies >> New Testament Studies
- eBooks >> Biblical Studies >> Pauline Studies
- eBooks >> Theology >> Biblical Theology
- eBooks >> Theology >> Topics of Debate