When it comes to explanations of human nature and proclivities, science and theology often find themselves talking past each other, so it may be difficult to imagine a conversation with evolutionary biology about the profoundly theological notion of holiness. Matthew Hill not only imagines it but exemplifies it, working deftly with sociobiology and Wesleyan theology in a way that brings the two into a fruitful interaction focused on divine grace working within the restraints of creation. We are indebted to Hill for this fine display of science-faith dialogue and robust emphasis on the centrality of the church and its practices for Christian formation.
-Joel B. Green,
Fuller Theological Seminary
At a time when scientific creationists and intelligent design theorists remain mired in nineteenth-century disputes about evolution, Matthew Nelson Hill's Evolution and Holiness moves the conversation about Darwin's controversial theory into the twenty-first century. Lamenting that 'not many theologians have examined the evolutionary data for relevance to "loving thy neighbor,"' Hill develops powerful and deeply meaningful connections between John Wesley's doctrine of Christian holiness and scientifically informed understandings of our evolved human nature. The result is a tour de force of creative theological exploration that deserves to be widely read.
scholar in residence, Stonehill College
So many Christian books on evolution are purely defensive. Here Matthew Hill has both critique and constructive dialogue with cutting-edge science, showing how theology - and Wesleyan theology in particular - can both contribute to and learn from science in the exciting pursuit to be fully human.
principal, St. John's College, Durham University
Theology and science have valuable insights to offer each other in understanding the origins and development of human moral and religious sentiments. Matthew Hill makes an important contribution by clearly summarizing some of the recent science on the evolution of human behavior, critiquing the materialistic philosophical extensions that are sometimes added to the science and then showing how theologically inspired practices from the Wesleyan tradition synergize with recent scientific work.
associate professor of physics, Calvin College
'Having trouble living the holy life? You just need to try harder!' Unfortunately, many Christians hear this message. 'Just try harder,' however, ignores the powerful role our bodies - including our genes and the body of Christ, Christian community - must play in following Jesus' command to be holy. In this book, Matthew Nelson Hill explores the sociobiological roots of human behavior, including the constraints we all face. Along the way, Hill helps us understand altruism and generosity in ways that make sense scientifically, theologically and experientially. He argues that loving communities and their practices stand the best chance in helping us walk the highway of holiness.
-Thomas Jay Oord,
author of The Uncontrolling Love of God
John Wesley insisted that the most compelling evidence for (1) the integrity of human choice and (2) the possibility of authentic love of God and neighbor was the life of a Christian saint, but he also recognized the value - yea, the necessity - of contesting scientific accounts of human nature and action that appeared to undercut these convictions. Matthew Hill's engagement with sociobiology is an insightful continuation of this apologetic task, defending the possibility of and offering wisdom toward the nurturing of Christian saints in our day.
-Randy L. Maddox,
William Kellon Quick Professor of Wesleyan and Methodist Studies, Duke University Divinity School
What a good book! Hill's study moderates the best kind of dialogue between faith and science in which a fluent assessment of the discipline of sociobiology (in his case) interacts with a faithful understanding of John Wesley's pivotal doctrine of Christian perfection (holiness) to produce a deepened understanding of the gains of science and the practice of faith. This book exemplifies, then, a way forward in the mostly messy slugfest between faith and science that typifies this dialogue in the secular academy and evangelical church. I highly recommend Hill's programmatic discourse to faculty and clergy alike.
-Robert W. Wall,
Seattle Pacific University and Seminary