- All Products
- Accompaniment Tracks
- Bible Accessories
- Bible Covers
- Bible Studies & Curriculum
- Buy in Bulk
- Christian Living
- Church & Pastoral
- Church Supplies
- Clothing & Accessories
- Crafts & Recreation
- eBooks On Sale
- Gift & Home
- Last Chance Bargains
- New Cyber Deals
- New Release
- Slightly Imperfect
- Streaming Video
- Sunday School
|Format: Compact disc|
Number of Pages: 256
|Publication Date: 2012|
Is "pro-choice" a neutral position?
For 40 years since the landmark Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision, the abortion debate has been highly charged and politicized. Questions like theseand passionate but widely varying answershave become the common language of the public dialogue on this issue. Yet behind the scenes of this historic case are other intriguing questions:
· How did the Supreme Court come to be involved in the abortion debate?
· Was language manipulated to affect the outcome?
· What was the moral basis underlying the decision?
In Compelling Interest, author Roger Resler draws on original sources, including the actual transcripts for oral arguments, the majority and minority opinions, and comments by the lawyers and others involved to take a careful look at the real story behind the historic Roe v. Wade decision.
Resler includes conversations with experts, including sociology professor Dr. William Brennan, the late Dr. Mildred Jefferson and Dr. Carolyn Gerster who co-founded the National Right to Life Committee, prolific author and speaker Randy Alcorn, bioethics professor Dr. Gerard Magill, perinatologist Dr. James Thorp, and photojournalist Michael Clancy.
This carefully researched book speaks with a thought-provoking, balanced voice that stands out from the usual partisan rhetoric on the topic.
"This is a must read for anyone, whether you consider yourself pro-life or pro-choice. We must be prepared with factual information, which is what this book gives you. The abortion lobby has fooled the American public far too long. We need to know the truth about abortion and how these laws came to be. Read this book to get the truth." - Abby Johnson, Author, Unplanned, Former Health Center Director, Planned Parenthood
John.g5 Stars Out Of 5Interesting is A Compelling InterestMay 8, 2016John.gQuality: 5Value: 5Meets Expectations: 5Every thinking person should read this book. I agree with the reviewer of "Compelling & Interesting" on what he states. I would like to also add a few comments. I stated every "thinking" person because this book is very intense, logical, well-documented and very well written. It is not for the uneducated. Resler takes every "Pro-choice" argument and critically analyzes it using the original speaker's intent or argument. He carries it to its logical conclusion and points out the numerous fallacies of each argument. One comes to draw the conclusion that "Pro-Choice" followers will grasp at every straw they can find to legitimitize the murder of innocent unborn.
While I would agree that there is some redundancy in his arguments, it is only because the same logic or illogic fits the argument he is analyzing. His arguments are not overstated but pressed upon the listener in such a manner that is unescapable and must be considered and confessed as true and accurate. This is not an easy listen, but very doable for anyone who is concerned about protecting the lives of the unborn and also examining what is and is not true.
I loved the audio edition. My wife and I listened to most of the book while on a weekend getaway several hours from our home. We often paused it and discussed the arguments. It helped us to think through our own understandings and further develop our arguments for preserving life. If you are looking for strictly a "biblical" treatice on the value of human life, you won't find it here. That is NOT the author's intend. Rather it is simply but profoundly a look at the arguments over the past 35 plus years in favor of abortion. The small amount spent on this book is a pitance compared to the value received of cogently thinking through abortion rhetoric, hype, and silly illogical arguments. I highly recoomend getting this book in some format, studying it, then engaging in discussions with those who may disagree with the pro-life position. I will be buying more to give away.
Mathaytes blogspotMichiganAge: 35-44Gender: male5 Stars Out Of 5Compelling & InterestingFebruary 4, 2013Mathaytes blogspotMichiganAge: 35-44Gender: maleQuality: 5Value: 5Meets Expectations: 5In the past 40 years, there have been many attempts from both sides of the abortion debate to frame the historical narrative to their advantage. Frequently, these attempts fail to address the fundamental issues involved because they do not take the time to understand the perspective of the other side. In his book, Compelling Interest: The Real Story Behind Roe vs. Wade, Roger Resler does the homework and offers a cogent analysis of the basic assumptions upon which the pro-abortion movement is based. Resler's analysis is relentlessly logical and he attacks the key philosophical underpinnings of the movement rather than wasting time knocking down straw men. Resler is unashamedly arguing from a pro-life position but his characterizations of the "pro-choice" position are well supported by direct quotations from leaders within the movement. He has clearly made an effort to understand the other side and that makes his critique much more powerful.
I liked several things about the book. First, and most importantly, Resler calls attention to the fact that fundamentally the abortion debate is a civil rights issue. The crux of the issue is whether it is appropriate for our legal system to define living human beings as "non-persons" and therefore deny to them rights and protections under the law. As Resler points out, the question of when human beings become full "persons" is a metaphysical rather than a scientific question. There is no biological question that a genetically unique human begins life at conception. The question is whether this human life should legally be considered a "person". Resler, like some others before him, highlights the fact that this is a debate about worldview issues rather than facts. From a legal standpoint, it is a debate about whether all humans possess unalienable rights that must be protected or if utilitarian value determines ones standing before the law.
Resler's analysis of the evolution of the semantics of abortion debate was also well done and valuable. I listened to the audiobook and was appreciative that the author narrated it. The reading was well done and quotations were often direct recordings of those quoted. Even when they were not, different voices were used which helped me follow the arguments and to keep my attention engaged. I especially appreciated the audio from the oral arguments before the court.
Other reviewers have mentioned that Resler is fond of overstatement and that the book gets redundant at times. There is a tendency toward dramatic emphasis but it simply reinforces the author's passion for the subject and is not too distracting. The organization of the work and Resler's desire to address each section thoroughly lends itself to a certain amount of repetition but the value is that each argument is essentially a contained unit increasing the usefulness of the book as a reference work. Resler is not the first person to make the arguments included in the book but his grasp of the material is outstanding and this book will be a helpful resource to those who are looking for a single volume that covers the range of issues involved. I recommend the book to anyone who wants to learn more about Roe vs. Wade or the abortion debate in general.