Agreeable Agreement: An Examination of the Quest for Consensus in Ecumenical Dialogue
Stock No: WW607183
Agreeable Agreement: An Examination of the Quest for Consensus in Ecumenical Dialogue  -     By: Minna Hietamki

Agreeable Agreement: An Examination of the Quest for Consensus in Ecumenical Dialogue

T&T Clark / 2010 / Hardcover

In Stock
Stock No: WW607183

Buy Item Our Price$275.00
In Stock
Quantity:
Stock No: WW607183
T&T Clark / 2010 / Hardcover
Quantity:

Add To Cart

or checkout with

Add To Wishlist
Quantity:


Add To Cart

or checkout with

Wishlist

Product Close-up
This product is not available for expedited shipping.
* This product is available for shipment only to the USA.
In This Series (3)
Select this Item Product Title/Author Availability Price Quantity
$275.00
In Stock
Our Price$275.00
Add To Cart
$275.00
$250.00
In Stock
Our Price$250.00
Add To Cart
$250.00

Product Information

Title: Agreeable Agreement: An Examination of the Quest for Consensus in Ecumenical Dialogue
By: Minna Hietamki
Format: Hardcover
Number of Pages: 272
Vendor: T&T Clark
Publication Date: 2010
Dimensions: 9.21 X 6.14 X 0.63 (inches)
Weight: 1 pound 4 ounces
ISBN: 0567607186
ISBN-13: 9780567607188
Series: Ecclesiological Investigations
Stock No: WW607183

Publisher's Description

In recent bilateral ecumenical dialogue the aim of the dialogue has been to reach some form of doctrinal consensus. The three major chapters of the book discuss the variety of forms of doctrinal consensus found in ecumenical dialogues among Anglicans, Lutherans and Roman Catholics. In general, the dialogue documents argue for agreement/consensus based on commonality or compatibility.

Each of the three dialogue processes has specific characteristics and formulates its argument in a unique way. The Lutheran-Roman Catholic dialogue has a particular interest in hermeneutical questions and proposes various forms of "differentiated" or perspectival forms of consensus. The Anglican-Roman Catholic dialogue emphasises the correctness of interpretations. The documents consciously look towards a "common future", not the separated past.

Ask a Question

Author/Artist Review