After Jesus, Volume 1 - The Birth of Christianity: The First Twenty Years
Number of Pages: 230
Vendor: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.
Publication Date: 2004
|Dimensions: 9 X 6 (inches)|
Availability: In Stock
Early Christian Life and Thought in Social ContextMark HardingContinuum International / 2003 / Trade Paperback$85.00Availability: Usually ships in 24-48 hours.CBD Stock No: WW56042
The First Christian Centuries: Perspectives on the Early ChurchPaul McKechnieInter-Varsity Press / 2002 / Trade Paperback$23.40 Retail:5 Stars Out Of 5 1 Reviews
$26.00Save 10% ($2.60)Availability: Usually ships in 24-48 hours.CBD Stock No: WW26773
Writing in a very accessible style, Barnett provides an informative, reliable chronology of the years immediately following Jesus' crucifixion. Just as important, he presents the historical sources, biblical clues, and other telling evidence that we have for accurately documenting this crucial period of time. Looking more widely, Barnett also surveys world events during Christianity's first twenty years and notes their impact on life in the early church.
The Birth of Christianity: The First Twenty Years is Volume 1 of a trilogy titled After Jesus. Volume 2 will be Paul, Missionary of Jesus, and Volume 3 will be Finding the Historical Christ.
Dick HarfieldSydney NSWAge: Over 65Gender: male2 Stars Out Of 5Written to confirm tradition rather than informJuly 12, 2013Dick HarfieldSydney NSWAge: Over 65Gender: maleQuality: 1Value: 3Meets Expectations: 1Barnett opens with a citation from John Dominic Crossan, 'The Birth of Christianity', provides a number of criticisms of Dominic's views and even (perhaps subconsciously) chose the same title for this book, so we can say he was influenced by Crossan. However, there is a difference in approach. For example, Crossan reviewed the available evidence for Jewish literacy in the first century and concluded from this that it was quite low by modern standards and hardly different from literacy elsewhere in the Roman Empire; Barnett ignores this and simply assumes that Jewish literacy was relatively high, and requires his readers to accept this information.
The book does not follow argument rigorously. It acknowledges that we do not know who the anonymous author of Luke-Acts was, but insists he must have been an associate of Paul, because of the use of 'we' in some passages - from here on it becomes fact, then the associate of Paul becomes Luke the physician. "For convenience," Barnett limits the letters of Paul to 1 Thessalonians, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Galatians and Romans., which he notes are not disputed, but proceeds to use 2 Thessalonians and 2 Timothy as evidence about Paul. I would feel more comfortable if he adopted a single position, even if he chose not to support that position, rather than adopt different positions in different texts.
I found the lists of parallels between Paul's epistles and the gospels useful, although I could debate the direction of flow. Much of this short book is concerned with explaining the New Testament texts, including authorship and chronology, so there is not a lot of material about the early years of Christianity.
Rich Bland5 Stars Out Of 5March 8, 2006Rich BlandPaul Barnett's work is worth your consideration. His writing style is very much the way a reader thinks in terms of logical organization. He has several books now in circulation and I have them all. If you are looking for easy to read NT background material that is also detailed and exhaustive, then this guy's work is for you.