Christian Apologetics: An Anthology of Primary Sources - eBook
A strong collection of primary sources
Zondervan has just put out a primary source compendium called Christian Apologetics: An Anthology of Primary Sources, edited by Khaldoun A. Sweis and Chad V. Meister.
There are 54 selections divided into 11 parts. Christian Apologetics begins with some methodological considerations in part 1, then moves right into various arguments for the existence of GodÃ¢ÂÂcosmological, teleological, ontological, moral, the argument from religious experience, and so on. From there the book narrows to more specific topics like the Trinity, the incarnation, miracles, the resurrection, the problem of evil, and more.
Christian Apologetics claims to be Ã¢ÂÂa sampling of some of the best works written by Christian apologists throughout the centuries,Ã¢ÂÂ offering Ã¢ÂÂa snapshot of Christian apologetics at its best across the spectrum of time and culture.Ã¢ÂÂ
The essays in this volume certainly are some of the best in apologetics. There is Paul at the Areopagus in Acts 17, Aquinas on the cosmological argument for GodÃ¢ÂÂs existence, Anselm and Plantinga with the ontological argument for God, PascalÃ¢ÂÂs wager, Teresa of Avila on experiencing God, Anselm on the incarnation, Swinburne on miracles, John HickÃ¢ÂÂs Ã¢ÂÂSoul Making Theodicy,Ã¢ÂÂ Augustine on free will, and Marilyn McCord Adams on horrendous evil and the goodness of God. Each of these essays is a classic and makes a valuable contribution to the area of apologetics.
The book spans Ã¢ÂÂthe spectrum of timeÃ¢ÂÂ fairly well, with a higher concentration of 20th century writers. Just a couple of the contributors are women, and the overwhelming majority hail from Western contextsÃ¢ÂÂthis latter an admission of the book, but a weakness all the same.
A particularly pleasant surprise to me was the inclusion of an an article by R.T. France, in which he makes the case for the historical reliability of the Gospels, which must, he argues, be understood in their proper literary context as Ã¢ÂÂhighly selectiveÃ¢ÂÂ records of JesusÃ¢ÂÂ life with Ã¢ÂÂonly a loose chronological framework.Ã¢ÂÂ This is not due to deficiency of the Gospels; rather, it is how the Gospel writers intended to write:
"The four canonical gospels will not answer all the questions we would like to ask about the founder of Christianity; but, sensitively interpreted, they do give us a rounded portrait of a Jesus who is sufficiently integrated into what we know of first-century Jewish culture to carry historical conviction, but at the same time sufficiently remarkable and distinctive to account for the growth of a new and potentially world-wide religious movement out of his life and teaching."
As I read I appreciated a statement in the bookÃ¢ÂÂs general introduction:
"But arguments and evidences do not of themselves bring someone into new life in Christ. Here the work of the Holy Spirit is central, and we must be willing to surrender to his leading and his truth and his goodness if we are to truly dwell with the Lord."
I had hoped to hear more in this book about the role of the Holy Spirit in apologetics. There is a short (one paragraph) treatment by James K. Beilby in chapter 3 that asks, Ã¢ÂÂWhat is the role of the Holy Spirit in apologetics?Ã¢ÂÂ He rightly (in my view) sees it as Ã¢ÂÂnot a zero-sum game.Ã¢ÂÂ The apologist should be Ã¢ÂÂsignificantly involvedÃ¢ÂÂ yet Ã¢ÂÂstill hold that the Holy Spirit will determine the effectiveness of our efforts.Ã¢ÂÂ
Though the Holy Spirit receives treatment in the section on the Trinity (by Origen, Aquinas, the Creeds, and Thomas V. Morris) and on the Bible (Calvin and canonization), there is never more than BeilbyÃ¢ÂÂs paragraph treatment about the role of the Holy Spirit in the project of apologetics. Cogent though Beilby is, I would think Ã¢ÂÂa snapshot of Christian apologetics at its bestÃ¢ÂÂ should make more mention of something like the Wesleyan view of prevenient grace or even the notion that the Holy Spirit witnesses to a personÃ¢ÂÂs heart before an apologist does. Only the former can enable the latter. Christian Apologetics is not without the exploration of other methodological considerations; I just would have liked to have seen more of this one.
Several other possible areas for improvement in a future edition could be more on faith and reason and how the two interrelate, as well as arguments for the existence of God that take into account and respond to the varous assertions made by the Ã¢ÂÂnew atheismÃ¢ÂÂ (anemic though it is).
All in all, though, this is a strong work, and IÃ¢ÂÂm happy for it to sit alongside my old college text, Readings in the Philosophy of Religion. ZondervanÃ¢ÂÂs Christian Apologetics is a worthy, if basic, reference guide. I expect it will serve apologists well.
Thanks to Zondervan for the review copy, which I was given for the purposes of review, though without any expectations as to the nature of my review.
October 24, 2012