In Ruth, Tod Linafelt offers an interpretation of the book which he calls "unsettling," in that he refuses to settle on a single meaning in a book so fraught with complexity and ambiguity. Ambiguity built into grammar, syntax, and vocabulary carrie over into the larger issues of characterization, theology, and the book's purpose. He also argues that Ruth is intended to read as an interlude between Judges and Samuel. Esther, by Timothy Beal, focuses on a story of anti-Judaism in an ancient world that raises contemporary questions about sexism, ethnocentrism, and natioinal identity. Beal questions the text without assuming that there will be univocal answers, allowing for complexity, perplexity, and the importance of accidents. Beal emphasizes the general and the tenative over the continuous. Using rhetorical criticism as a way into the text, Beal also focuses on its narrative structure.
<p>Some ancient works of literature survive in fragments that appear so simple and complete it's hard to imagine them as being part of a larger narrative. Such is the case with Ruth and Esther. On first reading they appear so simple, so whole, and their meanings so completely self-evident. Yet the closer you look, the more perplexing they become. <i>Ruth and Esther</i> offers that close look, enabling readers to discover the uncertainties of the texts and demonstrating how these uncertainties are not problems to be solved, but rather are integral to the narrative art of these texts.</p> <p>In <i>Ruth</i>, the first part of this volume, Tod Linafelt highlights the most unresolved and perplexing aspects of Ruth. In doing so he offers an interpretation he calls unsettling." Linafelt states that it is unsettling in the sense that he often refuses to *settle - on a single, unequivocal meaning of a particular word, phrase, or theme. Rather he prefers to underscore the dual or even multiple meanings that the narrative so often has. Another way <i>Ruth</i> differs from other interpretations is that Linafelt entertains the possibility that there might be complexity or ambiguity with regard to the various characters' motivations, the presentation of God, or the book's purpose. In this commentary, Linafelt explores the ambiguities of meaning built into the grammar, syntax, and vocabulary of the story to discover how these ambiguities carry over to the larger interpretive issues of characterization, theology, and purpose. He also lays forth an argument that the book of Ruth is intended to be read as an interlude between Judges and Samuel.</p> <p>The second part of this volume focuses on Esther, a story of anti-Judaism that raises strikingly contemporary questions concerning relations between sexism, ethnocentrism, and national identity. In <i>Esther</i> Timothy Beal guides readers into the meaning of the story using rhetorical criticism. He asks questions without assuming that there must be answers and allows for complexity, perplexity, and the importance of accidents in the text. In essence, Beal emphasizes the particular over the general and the tentative over the continuous; however, he does not altogether dismiss the importance of broader interpretations of Esther, especially those focusing on narrative structure.</p> <p>Chapters in <i>Ruth</i> are *The Bond between Ruth and Naomi, - *Finding Favor in Boaz's Field, - *An Ambiguous Encounter in the Night, - and *Making It al Legal. - </p> <p>Chapters in <i>Esther</i> are *Beginning with the End of Vashti: Esther 1:1-22, - *Remembering to Forget: Esther 2:1-4, - *New Family Dynamics: Esther 2:5-18, - *Coup: Esther 2:19-23, - *Politics of Anti-Judaism: Esther 3:1-15, - *Another Quarter: Esther 4:1-17, - *Face to Face: Esther 5:1-8, - *Fifty Cubits for Mordecai: Esther 5:9-14, - *Sleep Deserts: Esther 6:1-14, - *Coming Out Party: Esther 7:1- 10, - *Overwriting: Esther 8:1-17, - and *Aftermath: Esther 9:1 - 10:3. - </p. <p><i>Timothy K. Beal, Ph.D., is Harkness Associate Professor of Biblical Literature at Case Western Reserve University.</p> <p>Tod Linafelt, Ph.D., is assistant professor of biblical studies at Georgetown University.</i></p>"
Tod Linafelt, Ph.D., is assistant professor of biblical studies at Georgetown University.
Esther is an unknown book for many Christians. It has been the centre of much recent interest by feminist scholars and it could be of interest as it treats of ethnic, religious and gender discrimination.
The volume contributes greatly to the promise of this new series, and alerts us to future important and insightful work we may expect from these emerging scholars.
Walter Brueggemann, Columbia Theological Seminary
. . . both commentaries are innovative, evocative, clear, and compelling, disturbing the conventional and traditional explanations of these books.
Gene M. Tucker
. . . this is a compelling book for anyone interested in the dynamics of human character at the boundaries of existence - where hunger, hatred, desire, and resistance to death are worked out in enigmatic plays of truth and deception - and where God is registered as much by absence as by presence.
Carol A. Newsom, Candler School of Theology, Emory University
I highly recommend this volume as a useful resource for upper-level college and graduate students as well as for scholars.
The Catholic Biblical Quarterly
. . . a new and lively interpretation of Esther which should appeal to all.
Society for Old Testament Study
Have a question about this product? Ask us here.