I like having the lexical forms printed in bold and keyed to Mounce's Morphology. But Mounce's Analytical Lex has too many inadequacies. Above all, cognates are not listed under the word from which the family was derived. Second, I seldom see compounds split into their simplex words, with definitions of uncommon simplex words. Such things are extremely helpful and necessary. The principle parts of verbs are also listed in a format which is too concise, especially since the last principle parts can vary from middle to passive forms. It is better to show the abbreviated name of each principle part in front of it (e.g., "aor 2 mid, ..."). Mounce also does not provide forms of words in variant readings. Therefore, since Moulton's Analytical Lex has all these very important features which are missing in Mounce's, I still recommend Moulton's.